A code-receiving case has revealed many cross-border account risk control loopholes, involving identity verification, device fingerprinting, and IP tracking.
In 2026, police cracked a large-scale code-receiving case. A criminal gang used a code-receiving platform to provide fake phone numbers for cross-border account registration, bypassing platform verification.
This case exposed the weakness of some cross-border platforms in the identity verification process. Relying solely on phone number verification is not enough to prevent malicious registration.
In the case, over 100,000 cross-border accounts were registered through this code-receiving platform, covering e-commerce, social media, and other fields.
Many cross-border platforms rely on phone number verification, while code-receiving platforms can provide a large number of temporary phone numbers, creating opportunities for malicious registration.
Although some platforms have added SMS verification codes, they may still be cracked by the automatic reception function of code-receiving platforms.
About 30% of cross-border platforms still mainly relied on phone numbers for identity verification in 2026.
In the registration and use of some cross-border accounts, device fingerprints and IP addresses were not effectively tracked and restricted.
Criminal gangs can disguise devices and IPs through virtual private networks (VPNs) and multi-opening emulators to evade platform monitoring.
In one case, hundreds of cross-border accounts were registered under the same IP.
| Platform Type | Common Risk Control Measures | Loophole Existence |
|---|---|---|
| E-commerce Platforms | Phone number verification, payment verification | High, easily breached by code-receiving |
| Social Media Platforms | Email verification, friend-assisted verification | Medium, with certain bypass possibilities |
| Financial Service Platforms | Multi-factor authentication, biometrics | Low, but still at risk of attack |
Cross-border enterprises should strengthen multi-factor authentication and combine technologies such as device fingerprinting and IP analysis to improve risk control capabilities.
Individual studios should be cautious when choosing code-receiving services and avoid using illegal code-receiving platforms to prevent account bans and legal risks.
A code-receiving platform is a service platform that provides temporary mobile phone numbers for receiving SMS verification codes, often used to register various accounts.
It may lead to problems such as malicious registration, fraudulent transactions, and account theft, damaging the interests and reputation of enterprises and individuals.
You need to examine its compliance, technical strength, and reputation. For example, Getfollow has certain credibility and technical guarantees in the industry.
Set strong passwords, enable multi-factor authentication, and do not input account information casually on unknown websites.
In conclusion, this code-receiving case serves as a wake-up call. Cross-border account risk control loopholes urgently need to be addressed, and both enterprises and individuals should be vigilant.