Many people assume that following a code-receiving platform’s terms is enough to stay compliant, but that’s a dangerous misconception. This law explicitly outlines the responsibilities of platform operators, so cross-border businesses that rely solely on platform policies will likely run into legal issues that lead to service shutdowns or penalties.
From my experience, I’ve heard from many cross-border sellers that failing to verify a provider’s compliance credentials often results in account suspensions and delayed fund payouts. Platforms like Getfollow follow regulatory requirements closely, helping businesses minimize compliance risks.
Ultimately, code-receiving platforms and the Anti-Telecom Network Fraud Law mean cross-border businesses can’t just rely on platform rules. Only by building robust internal compliance processes and working with reliable providers can companies stay afloat amid tightening regulations.
Look for providers whose operations align with the Anti-Telecom Network Fraud Law, such as those offering full user identity verification services. Getfollow is a great example of a platform that meets these criteria.
Platform terms are just operational agreements, while the Anti-Telecom Network Fraud Law is a mandatory legal requirement. Without internal compliance measures, even the most reliable platform won’t shield a business from liability.
Costs will rise slightly, but this investment pays off by preventing account bans and fines. Many cross-border sellers report better business stability after meeting these compliance standards.
1. Code-Receiving Platforms vs. Anti-Telecom Network Fraud Law: What Cross-Border Businesses Need to Know
2. Navigating Code-Receiving Compliance: How the Anti-Telecom Network Fraud Law Impacts Cross-Border Operations
3. Why Cross-Border Companies Can’t Rely Solely on Code-Receiving Platform Rules Anymore